BATMAN, METAL MEN & SUPERMAN

BACK TO BACK IN THE

APRIL 1973 D-4 DC SUPER PAC

 

 
 

 
In spite of the hugely successful comeback of the superhero genre in the early 1960s, the comic book industry was rapidly losing its traditional sales points. Small stores that had carried comic books were being pushed out of business by larger stores and supermarkets, and newsagents started to view the low cover prices and therefore tiny profit margins comics had to offer as a nuisance. Comic book publishers desperately needed to open up new sales opportunities and tap into a new customer base, and one place these potential buyers could be found were supermarkets, chain stores and gas stations. But in order to be able to sell comic books at these locations, the product would have to be adjusted.
 
Handling individual issues clearly was no option for these outlets, but by looking at their logistics and display practices, DC Comics found that the answer to breaking into this promising new market was to simply package several comic books together in a transparent plastic bag - so they came up with the Comicpac concept in 1961).

This resulted in a higher price per unit on sale, which made the whole business of stocking them much more worthwhile for the seller. The simple packaging was also rather nifty because it clearly showed the items were new and untouched, while at the same time blending in with most other goods sold at supermarkets, which were also conveniently packaged.

 
 
Supermarkets were even supplied with dedicated Comicpac racks, which enhanced the product appeal even more since the bags containing the comic books could be displayed on hooks in an orderly and neat fashion. It almost became an entirely different class of commodity, and offered parents (and their kids) the opportunity and convenience to pick up a few comics at the same time they were doing their general shopping.

 

"DC's focus [for the Comicpac] was on both the casual reader and the parents and grandparents who were looking for gifts." (Wells, 2012)

DC's "comicpacks" were a success, and other publishers quickly started to copy the concept.

"The DC [comic packs] program lasted well over a decade, with pretty high distribution numbers. The Western program was enormous - even well into the '70s they were taking very large numbers of DC titles for distribution (I recall 50,000+ copies offhand)." (Paul Levitz, in Evanier 2007)

By the early 1970s, DC relaunched their comic packs, calling them DC Super Pacs, and they continued to sell well, containing regular news stand editions.

 

 
This April 1973 (D-4) DC SUPER PAC contains Detective Comics #434, Metal Men #43, and Action Comics #423. DC handled its multi-comic packs in a very structured and organised manner; a D-4 pack from a specific year would carry the same titles and issues no matter where or when it was sold (rare packaging errors aside). The digits (1-12) referred to the month and the letters (A through D) marked the four different packs produced each month. "D-4" therefore denotes the fourth April SUPER PAC, in this case from 1973, containing comic books with an April cover date or (April/May in the case of a bi-monthly title).
 
No titles had permanent slots in the SUPER PACs, although there was a high level of consistency with DC's flagship characters (the SUPER PACs of 1973 contained complete runs of Superman and Batman as well as the Batman team-up title Brave and the Bold). But since sales points could vary a lot with regard to their supplies and selection of SUPER PACs, the availability of specific titles was never guaranteed - but that was something many comic book readers in the 1970s had to put up with anyway, whether their comic books came packaged in a plastic bag or as single issues from a display or spinner rack. But since DC's editorial at large still very much embraced the "single issue, done in one" storyline principle during the early 1970s (rather unlike their major competitor Marvel), it often didn't even matter in which sequence you read your copies of Batman or Superman.
 

 

 

DETECTIVE COMICS #434

April 1973
(monthly)
On Sale:
27 February 1973

Editor - Julius Schwartz
Cover - Michael Wm. Kaluta (pencils & inks)

Batman: "The Spook That Stalked Batman!"
(14.5 pages)
Story - Frank Robbins
Pencils - Irv Novick
Inks - Dick Giordano
Lettering -
Ben Oda

Hawkman: "Riddle Of The Red-Handed Robber!"
(8 pages)
Story - E. Nelson Bridwell
Pencils - Rich Buckler
Inks - Dick Giordano
Lettering -
Ben Oda


 
PLOT SUMMARIES - Criminals in Gotham City are being helped by a mysterious and ghost-like entity known as The Spook, who seems to uses mystical powers to get crooks out of prison or tight situations. In order to stop the Spook, the Batman disguises himself as a criminal, has himself locked up in prison, and then finds himself face to face with the Spook... (to be continued). Hawkman is confronted with an odd thief who steals valuable items from museums in broad daylight with no attempt to avoid arrest, but no objects can be found on him once he is at the police station...where is the loot?
 
By 1973, the new course that writer Dennis O'Neil and artist Neal Adams had taken the Batman on since early 1970, was firmly established, and with it came a clear distinction between the Caped Crusader's two main titles.

"When I took over the franchise I said okay, this is the way we do it. Batman comics will be about superhero stuff with a lot of action, and Detective Comics is about the same character functioning as a detective." (O'Neil, in Handziuk 2019)

In general, this meant that costumed villains would feature in Batman whereas Detective Comics focussed more on plain clothes thugs and evil-doers.


Frank Robbins
(1917-1994)

  But there is no rule without exception: Detective Comics #434 features a villain that seems more ghostly than human, and who is certainly costumed: "The Spook... Mystic Mastermind of the Impossible".

But Frank Robbins was so well versed at scripting Batman stories with a heavy emphasis on detection work that he made sure it would be the Caped Crusader's abilities at deduction and reasoning that would unmask and bring down the Spook...

...although readers would have to wait for the next issue of Detective Comics to see that happen (another exception - no "done-in-one").

 
 
Robbins, who was both an artist and a writer, started working for DC in 1968 and almost immediately took over scripts for both Batman and Detective Comics. Together with Dennis O'Neil and Neal Adams, Frank Robbins along with artist Irv Novick are credited with returning the Batman to his darker roots by making him a more brooding character - and fittingly enough, Novick was assigned to pencil this first appearance of the Spook as co-creator.
 
 

The choice was spot on as Irv Novick's pencils, along with Dick Giordano's inks, provide exactly the kind of spooky atmospheric artwork required to make this tale work.

Novick spent almost his entire career in the comic book industry after graduating from the National Academy of Design in New York City. In the mid-1960s DC Comics offered him an unprecedented freelance contract which guaranteed him the highest artist's rate plus a steady amount of work.

In essence, this meant that as soon as Novick had finished a job he was to immediately receive another assignment - resulting in a substantial body of artwork for DC over the years.

 


Irv Novick
(1916-2004)

 
When Carmine Infantino became a part of DC's management in 1968 he made sure that Novick became a full-time superhero penciller, thus providing the artwork for most of DC's top titles of the genre, including numerous contributions to Batman and Detective Comics.
 
Irv Novick had a substantial part in shaping the visuals of Batman during the late 1960s and all throughout the 1970s. Retaining his very own style, he (together with a few other pencillers) fleshed out the popular culture icon look which Neal Adams had created, and left a lasting contribution to the hallmark appearance and visuals of the Darknight Detective - which still remain iconic to this day.

His pencils have a classic touch in the best sense of the word, and his pictorial storytelling is fresh and dynamic and even made some of the lamer plots of the Bronze Age look interesting.

 
 
Not that the latter quality was needed in this case, as Frank Robbins seizes on all the opportunities offered by the ghostly Spook, presenting readers with a plot that is both baffling and filled with (nomen est omen) spooky atmosphere.
 
The Spook was also brilliantly and evocatively portrayed on the cover of Detective Comics #434, pencilled and inked by Michael W. Kaluta.

"The Batman covers, whether they were [by Neal Adams] or the odd ones that Mike Kaluta did during that period, were set-pieces way above, I think, most of the rest." (Levitz, in O'Neil, Adams, Levitz & Evanier 2011)

Michael William Kaluta (sometimes credited as Mike Kaluta or MW Kaluta) pencilled and inked three Batman and eight Detective Comics covers between 1972 and 1974, all of which convey a unique feel for the iconic qualities of Gotham's Caped Crusader.

His cover for Detective Comics #434 is a prime example of his ability to evoke and capture the atmosphere surrounding the Batman, and rather unsurprisingly it was reused on several foreign market reprint editions.

 


Michael W. Kaluta (*1947)

 


Lynvingen #9 (Williams Forlag, Norway, December 1973), Batman Classics #45 (Williams, Netherlands, 1974)
Batman #49 (Editoria Brasil-América, Brazil, September 1974), Batman 2. Superband (Egmont Ehapa, Germany, 1975)

 
The Spook, as thought up by Frank Robbins and visually rendered by Irv Novick for his first appearance in Detective Comics #434, is actually an architectural draftsman named Val Kaliban who, in his professional capacity, tampered with the plans for Gotham's maximum security prison by constructing a network of secret passages throughout the prison without anybody realizing what was going on.
 
Once the prison was built, Kaliban intended to use the secret passages to offer convicts a way out if they payed him. But since he is also a master escape artist and a trained hypnotist, this allowed him to create the illusion of a ghostly appearance which is further enhanced by his aptitude in creating and using a wide array of gadgets and devices, taking his simulations of various supernatural effects to a level of near perfection - and calling himself "the Spook".

Having built up this seemingly unearthly villain, Robbins then pulls readers back into the realm of reality by means of the Batman himself. Always a person of logic, the Darknight Detective reminds Alfred (and therefore the readers) to "make no mistake, we're dealing with a man - not a spook".

If you liked ghost stories (and who didn't in the 1970s) then the Spook was definitely an awesome Batman villain. However, the character was only given a handful of appearances throughout the 1970s in Detective Comics (#434, #435, #488, #526) and Batman (#252, #276, #291-294, #304). He then faded into limbo before returning in 1997 in Legends of the Dark Knight #90-92. Ultimately (and really only mentioned here for the sake of completion) he even ends up being beheaded by Grant Morrison (well, Damian Wayne actually) in Batman #657 (November 2006).

One does wonder if Robbins, in creating the Spook's background story, was possibly inspired by real-life serial killer H. H. Holmes and his 1890s "murder hotel" in Chicago, with its nightmarish maze of hidden passages (Little, 2025).

 


Detail from the splashpage of Batman 2. Superband (Egmont Ehapa, Germany, 1975)

 
But regardless, his writing boils down to one thing:

"When Robbins stopped trying to [copy Stan Lee], he turned out to be a pretty good writer. In fact, he became my favorite Batman writer of the period and I was pretty fussy about Batman writers." (Evanier, 2023)

 


E. Nelson Bridwell (1931-1987)


Rich Buckler
(1949-2017)

  The back-up feature in Detective Comics would change frequently during the early 1970s, but a common theme of detective work was maintained.

In this issue, it is the turn of Hawkman, the "Winged Detective" (who is actually Katar Hol, a lawman from the planet Thanagar, who has been assigned and sent to Earth to study our police methods) to solve the "Riddle of the Red-Handed Robber".

The story runs for a mere 8 pages and was penned by E. Nelson Bridwell, whom Mark Evanier has called "one of the great unsung heroes of the comic book industry" (Evanier, 2011).

He was mainly an assistant editor at DC in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, and sometimes also took on writing chores.

"He was often more qualified than those he assisted and he frequently did their jobs for them or caught their mistakes." (Evanier, 2011)

The tale involving Batman and the Spook set the bar rather high, and the Hawkman story comes across as being rather mediocre (unless maybe you're a die hard Hawkman fan).

Rich Buckler's artwork is solid, but it can't carry the backup feature to a higher level.

 
 

 
 

 

 

METAL MEN #43

April/May 1973
(bi-monthly)
On Sale:
27 February 1973

Editor - Jeff Rovin
Cover - Ross Andru (pencils) & Mike Esposito (inks)
reprinted (adding the yellow frame) from Metal Men #14 (June/July 1965)

"The Headless Robots" (22.3 pages)
Story - Robert Kanigher
Pencils - Ross Andru
Inks - Mike Esposito

reprinted from Metal Men #14 (June/July 1965)
*

*The bottom two thirds of the original page 16, the first and third panels of the original page 16, and the original page 18 were removed for this reprint


PLOT SUMMARY - The Metal Men fight and defeat Chemo for the second time.


 
A group of six advanced, artificially intelligent robots, the Metal Men first appeared in Showcase #37 (March/April 1962). Created by scientist Dr. Magnus, they are named after specific metals (Gold, Iron, Lead, Mercury, Tin, and Platinum - the only female robot, also called "Tina") and possess abilities that reflected the traits of their namesake metal.
 
The characters were given their own title in May 1963, which ran on a bi-monthly publication schedule but dropping sales had the title cancelled after Metal Men #41 (December 1969). In March 1973, the title was brought back (Metal Men #42) for a total of mere three issues, all of which reprinted earlier material).

The title then again went on a hiatus until Metal Men #45 (May 1976), returning with original material and lasting until issue #56 (March 1978) when it fell victim to the infamous DC Implosion.

Reviving Metal Men for three issues of reprint material from the mid-1960s was most likely part of DC's attempt to fight back at Marvel's policy of putting out a slew of titles (in an attempt to increase their slice of the market and push the competition off the nwes agent shelves and displays). As with many other titles thrown out by DC during that period, Metal Men didn't work - and DC's head Carmine Infantino himself knew exactly why.

"The DC books were very sterile-looking in those days." (Infantino & Spurlock, 2001)

 

 

 

What Infantino was alluding to was the fact that DC was missing the boat with far too many of its featured characters in comparison to their competition - and no amount of advertising hyperbole (the in-house ad comes from Detective Comics #434) could change that. Whilst the story could be labelled different in a sense ("antiquated" might have been a better word for it), the pictures (i.e. artwork) definitely weren't daring - if anything, they reflected DC's sanitized house style of the 1960s.

Metal Men would make a comeback in DC's comicpacks, with issues #50 (included in the February 1977 B-2 "Dynamite Comics Pack") and #52 (April 1977 D-4).

 
 

 

 

ACTION COMICS #423

April 1973
(
monthly)
On Sale: 27 February 1973

Editor - Julius Schwartz
Cover - Nick Cardy (pencils & inks)

SUPERMAN: "Luthor's Hammer Of Hate" (14.5 pages)
Story - Cary Bates
Pencils - Curt Swan
Inks - Murphy Anderson
Lettering - Ben Oda

HUMAN TARGET: "The Deadly Dancer Contract!" (8 pages)
Story - Len Wein
Pencils & Inks - Dick Giordano


PLOT SUMMARIES - Luthor finds a means of transferring his hatred for Superman via an energized hammer into Superman himself, but the Man of Steel is back in control when he in turn transfers his anger to the Mento-Graph, which then burns itself out with rage / The Human Target poses as an accountant informing on the mob

 

 
When Action Comics #423 hit the newsstands (and as part of the 1973 B-4 Super-Pac), the Man of Steel's adventures were commonly in the hands of writer Cary Bates, taking turns with Elliot Maggin.

Cary Bates belonged to a number of DC Comics fans who turned writers at a very young age in the late 1960s and early 1970s, starting to submit ideas for comic book covers at the age of 13 (some of which were bought and published) and selling stories to DC when he was just 17 years old (Eury, 2013).

But whilst the scripting of Superman and other major DC characters was entrusted to younger newcomers such as Bates and Maggin, the artists involved belonged to the previous generation of DC staffers who had been working for the company for decades.

This in essence teamed up former fans with the comic book pencillers and inkers whose work they had enjoyed as young readers, and the age gap was always there - most visibly so when it came to attire.

 
 


Cary Bates
(*1948)

  Whereas Bates and Maggin sported long hair and casual clothes, veterans such as Curt Swan and Murphy Anderson would always be seen wearing shirts and dark ties. The relaxed appearance of the younger staff was only accepted reluctantly by the veteran DC editors, and there were certain limits.

"Whenever I came up to the DC offices to see [Mort Weisinger], he insisted I wear a tie (...) Mort once told me he didn't want Jack Liebowitz (DC's owner back in the day) to walk by his office to see him talking to some"hippie". But on the plus side at least he didn't ask me to get a haircut." (Bates in Stroud, 2011)

Long-standing Superman artists Curt Swan (pencils) and Murphy Anderson (inks) both produced work that not only conformed to the DC house style but in many ways shaped it.

"DC artists were forced to work within an established house style that governed the page layout as well as the look of the artwork. Editor Julie Schwartz's motto was 'if it's not clean, it's worthless'." (Tucker, 2017)

By the time the early 1970s rolled around this was relaxed a bit - but there was trouble brewing in the Superman Universe.

Julius Schwartz had only taken over the editorial reigns of Action Comics two issues previously, and he wasn't happy at all with its main character, the Man of Steel.

 


Curt Swan
(1920-1996)


Murphy Anderson
(1926-2015)

 

"Having spent much of the previous decade merely observing from the cultural sidelines, the now-thirtysomething Superman was hit hard by the disillusionment that seized the country in the 1970s (...) Marvel heroes bickered and questioned and agitated - they were agents of chaos, and they looked like the kids who read them. Superman, on the other hand, dutifully imposed order, and he looked like a cop." (Weldon, 2013)

And Schwartz wasn't alone in feeling that the character had somewhat fallen out of sync with the times.

"O'Neil shared his editor's ambivalence, because he figured that such a high-profile character would come with too many corporate strings attached. He also found it difficult to get excited about a character who could see through time and blow out a star. "How do you write stories about a guy who can destroy a galaxy by listening hard?" O'Neil famously joked." (Weldon, 2013)

Together, Schwartz and O'Neil reached the conclusion that the only way forward was to "depower" Superman - readers needed to see him struggle.

 


Julius Schwartz
(1915 - 2004)

 
And so, they took the man of Steel's well-known major weakness off the board as all Kryptonite on Earth was turned into iron by a freak scientific experiment in Superman #233 (January 1971). At the same time, Superman's powers started to mysteriously fade. It was a nice idea, but there simply were too many "super-this" and "super-that" abilities tied into Superman as a character, and Clark Kent was still constantly having to foil the discovery of his dual identity.
 
  At the end of the day, not too much changed after all - except O'Neil didn't want to write Superman anymore (Freiman, 2009).

Unless you were a die-hard Superman fan, a lot of those stories didn't really seem to go anywhere relevant. In comparison to Marvel's output, the Superman fare also seemed to be very much on the meek and mild side.

Not surprisingly, many readers bought Action Comics not because they were fans of Superman, but because of the second features appearing in the title (Kingman, 2013) - and Action Comics #423 most likely fell square into this segment of appeal with most readers.

 
The Human Target had only been introduced in Action Comics #419 (December 1972), and readers' reactions featured on the letters page in Action Comics #423 were mixed, ranging from outright enthusiasm to a sense of disappointment. Created by Len Wein and Carmine Infantino, the Human Target certainly provided some non-superhero interest, somewhere close to the spi-fi genre.
 
In contrast to the Superman yarn, the Human Target presented itself with some fresh and dynamic visuals, courtesy of Carmine Infantino, and Len Wein's story, albeit not great, had some edge and punch to it too.

   
 
The Human Target would leave Action Comics as back-up feature after issue #432 in February 1974 and move on to become the backup in Detective Comics until 1982 (with a few appearances in Brave and the Bold), before switching to Batman until late 1982. In 1999 he was given his own book in the Vertigo imprint which clocked up 21 issues and ran until 2005, and in 2010 Len Wein returned to the character for a DC mini-series as the Human Target also became a Fox TV series which ran for two seasons in 2010/11. In 2016, the character featured in season 5 of Warner Brothers' TV series Arrow, before returning in 2021 for a mini-series of 12 issues in DC's "Black Label" imprint.
 
 

 
There were many things that set DC apart from Marvel in the early 1970s, but one very salient aspect was DC's lack of any regular editorial feature across its titles through which editors would communicate with their readership (as Marvel and Stan Lee did with their famous Bullpen Bulletins); DC's interaction with its fans and readers was limited to the letters pages, whilst plugs for other titles were essentially restricted to in-house ads. If you picked up this April 1973 D-4 SuperPac, you came across the following.
 


Action Comics #423 (left), Metal Men #43 (center), Action Comics #423 (right)

 

 
FURTHER READING ON THE THOUGHT BALLOON
 
 
  "Comic packs" not only sold well for more than two decades, they also offer some interesting insight into the comic book industry's history from the 1960s through to the 1990s. There's more on their general history here.
 
  An overview and analysis of all the 1973 Super Pacs is available here.
 
  You can read more about the 1973 "war of the shelves" between Marvel and DC here.
 
 
 

 
BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
EURY Michael (2013) "A Super Salute to Cary Bates", Back Issue! #62, TwoMorrows

EVANIER Mark (2007) "More on Comicpacs", News From Me, published online 2 May 2007

EVANIER Mark (2011) "E.N.B. Remembered", News From Me, published online 24 October 2011

EVANIER Mark (2023) "About Frank Robbins – Part 1 of Three", News From Me, published online 29 September 2023

FREIMAN Barry M. (2009) "Exclusive Interview with Elliot S! Maggin", supermanhomepage.com, published online January 2009

HANDZIUK Alex (2019) "An Interview with Legendary Creator Denny O'Neil - The father of Modern Day Batman", cgmagonline.com, published online 16 March 2019

INFANTINO Carmine, with J. David Spurlock (2001) The Amazing World of Carmine Infantino. An Autobiography, Vanguard

KINGMAN Jim (2013) "The Ballad of Ollie and Dinah", in Back Issue #64 (May 2013)

LITTLE Becky (2025) "Did Serial Killer H.H. Holmes Really Build a ‘Murder Castle’?", history.com, pubölished online 23 January 2020, updated 28 May 2025

O'NEIL Denny, Neal Adams, Paul Levitz & Mark Evanier (2011) "Pro2Pro: Dark Rebirth", Back Issue #50, TwoMorrows Publishing

STROUD Bryan (2011) "Cary Bates Interview", wtv-zone.com, published online 14 October 2011

TUCKER Reed (2017) Slugfest: Inside the Epic Fifty-Year Battle between Marvel and DC, Sphere

WELDON Glen (2013) "The 70s Were Awkward for Superman", The Atantic, 3 April 2013

WELLS John (2012) American Comic Book Chronicles: The 1960s (1960-1964), TwoMorrows Publishing

 
 

 

 

 



(c) 2025

uploaded to the web 14 December 2025